Issuance of the first rule in Seoul Jeddah disaster

Fined Rush and corrupt million riyals, and their imprisonment of 5 years

Issued yesterday, the first rule in cases of disaster, Seoul, Jeddah, against the defendants, one hand on the blind leading the work in Jeddah, and the other a businessman, was convicted on charges of bribery, abuse of power careers. He spent the verdict fined each of them half a million riyals and imprisonment of 5 years, first as the corrupt and the other was sentenced to Rush and the Administrative Court in Jeddah.
According to the newspaper "Al-Watan" Saudi Arabia admitted to the second defendant, a businessman who is absent from all meetings of the Court and brought forcibly in the previous session, the details of the process of bribery, which reported, but after 7 years, after the judge faced the charges and evidence. He said that the coordination of the bribe was within the administration, headed by the first defendant, and came at the request of the first defendant (the employee) the agreement to rid the land, to pay him the second defendant 'businessman' bribe a whole million, received half before the operation, and the other after the operation.
He also admitted that he handed him a 500 thousand riyals half the agreed bribery inside the office real estate, and in the presence of a witness, a partner in the office real estate, and that he has no argument on the amount of bribery. He expressed regret that he found out later that the treatment of the earth was traveling a regular within the departments in the Secretariat in the process of clearance, and was not parked in the administration which works out the first defendant, who cheated and took 500 thousand riyals without conclude that treatment of the ground, and asked him to rid the treatment for one million Real, and that he waited for 7 years until he heard calls for war on corruption, he informed the competent authorities of bribery.
The first defendant, defense memorandum of 4 pages, in which he stated that the witness stated that the transaction is the case with the defendant stayed for several years, while the treatment I stayed only two years and, based on the procedures for the secretariat, and the accused is not linked. The judge responded by acknowledging the existence of transactions that the accused has a second, evidence that he knows to the second defendant, which he denied in the previous sessions. The second evidence is the witness who attended the delivery amount, and the third is to examine the property management director reported that the treatment was finished the second defendant has systematically, and that he does not know a reason to disable them. He returned the accused and his relationship and denied any knowledge of the treatment of the accused has a second, and he did not know anything about it.
The absence of 3 accused
The absence of 3 accused of 9 for a separate session, to the postponement of the verdict against them, after this meeting was scheduled for sentencing. He asked six defendants who attended the hearing, the court considered into mercy and compassion to what they have suffered in the case and the investigation, calling the judge to postpone sentencing, where he decided the head of the judicial Thirteenth Administrative Court, book files, nine accused until next week in preparation for the judgment against them.
The first defendant, which is an observer earlier in the Secretariat, it does not have a request or taking amounts bribery mentioned in the indictment, and that his confession certified legally taken from him by force and coercion, and the certified check take us, and sent it back to its owner after a year, and that the creditor is a friend of his father, while the second defendant did not attend the meeting.
The third defendant, is accused of bribing to provide 50 thousand riyals for the first defendant, he has denied all as stated in the indictment. He said he has no offense, and can refer to the website and send to the Commission engineering to make sure of that.
While said fourth defendant, is accused of paying a bribe of $ 300 thousand riyals for the first defendant to raise the buildings owned by irregularities, it does not have any offense, and while absent the fifth defendant, his agent confirmed that he heard only the former.
The appeal of the accused found not attending the sixth, while according to the seventh defendant to mediate between the sixth and the accused and the fact that the first defendant Raúh 50 thousand riyals. The ninth defendant, is accused in the crime of bribery to mediate between the owner of a gas station and the first defendant, and $ 20 thousand, it is only heard in previous meetings and approved. The defendants asked the court to mitigate and to consider them favorably and adjudication of the case. The court decided the case of the rule book on 9 July neighbor