Al Mjthel: Withdraw the project "Saher" in the interest of full and will solve the problem!

Kalbani system described by the collection of money and apologized Qahtani

 

Launched a Shura Council member Dr. Abdul Wahab Al Mjthel sharply criticized the way the system Saher traffic, and attributed the hatred and against citizens of the system to being applied on the non-governmental, and said: I think that the traffic management was more worthy of the application of the system and not to provide an opportunity for business to earn a living from citizens, in reference to the owner of the operating company for Saher Sheikh Saleh Kamel, supported the claim to disclose the budget for Saher and respond to the desire of public opinion in the detection of the position operator of the system and its relationship to the state, he said: The money goes to the Ministry of Finance and then give the ministry "article", meaning the company, The student responsible for Saher consider citizens' complaints and submit them to leaders in the Ministry of the Interior, came on Friday afternoon during its interaction with the program "the following statement," provided by our colleague Dr. media. Qassim Abdul-Aziz and broadcast satellite evidence of Islam.
For his part, supported guest program from Riyadh, Sheikh Adil Kalbani what Al Mjthel and called for the withdrawal of the project, Sheikh Saleh Kamel, moved the passage, and continued his criticism of Saher said: I am still insisting on a descriptive Sahir as the system of collection does not protect, and added that the confusion with Saher is in the mechanism of the application does not of being a system in origin, and denied the existence of correlation between the opposition Saher and objection to the State, adding: those familiar with the statement, Sheikh Saleh Kamel, the latter with respect to Bsahar knows where the money goes, and that the investor of the system, and considered that Sahir is a specific goal, noting that it is exists on the ways in which he called upon the ways fatal, and he began is incomplete and lacks many things Kchwefah handle, and the presence of a concern to respond to Astchkalat citizens, and the value of irregularities and the method of maximizing exaggerated to a great extent, and that the citizens did not Athaioa to deal with it enough, and refused to load scientists and preachers who refuse to Saher by some opinion writers responsibility to raise the atmosphere against Saher and push young people into taking on the assault, saying: There is no doubt that the scientists did not incite attacks or climate to commit them, Valantqadat do not mean to instigate and scientists have criticized did not incite, I did not hear one of the scientists instigated the attack on the system Saher or his staff, and objected to calls by some to bring the Sahir from the Department of Halal and Haram, pointing to the lack of agreement with the approach the State confirms that it is an Islamic state Salafi doctrine, and called for creation of the community to accept the system and improve roads and to discuss the value of irregularities and to clarify the motives and causes.
For his part, criticized the Shura Council member Dr. Abdul Rahman stubbornness during the overlapping in the program accelerate comprehensive system Saher, and his lack of awareness that pave the public opinion to accept it, pointing out that it was better for graduation in the application, and said that citizens look to Sahir like to adjust, not to reduce the irregularities, he said, adding that surveillance and phishing is not good practice to reduce the irregularities, and pointed out that Sahir is not the law, but falls within the other mechanisms for the application of traffic law and the obligation to him, like many other developed countries that class, and pointed out that solidarity with other members of the Shura Council presented a draft law is expected to consider it on Sunday next, to demand the abolition of the application of Article upper limit of the waste contained traffic law and limited to the repeated transgressions and stated that the Traffic Department to apply this rule arbitrarily, and agreed to intransigence on the proposal claim to disclose the budget for Sahir with the conversion of the remaining amounts of the deduction of wages of the operating company, to address and assist citizens affected by traffic accidents, maintenance and development of road network in the Kingdom.
In turn, was a professor of sociology and the guest of the program from Jeddah d. Bakr Bacadr believed that there is a need to have a law to ensure the public interest in public space, and Saher is part of the law, and which falls within the concept of deduction, and praised Saher said, "that he does not overlook any violation and do the process of applying the law, and statistics proved that controlling the behavior of people in public space and push them to drive a degree of fitness were not present and this is calculated to Saher, who look forward to the extension of its functions to other items to ensure the right of easement, and I wish that arise in people's conviction and feeling that if they violated the Vsieqbwa, "he said in criticizing the clear reluctance of some scientists against Saher" called young people to commit follies of the attack on Saher is heard as the system is not valid, the problem lies in the lack of accuracy in the use of language, when declaring some to be against the regime of Saher, without identifying the aspects of criticism specifically and rule never to pay citizens to commit negative reactions and wrong, "and added that the traffic needs to be a public relations campaign to explain the objectives of the system Saher, and called for removal of citizens' complaints regarding Bkadir speed limits and prevent stealth, and that the law should be objective and fair in dealing and accuracy in the use of language and contributing to the behaviors in public places to ensure the integrity and safety of citizens.
It is worth mentioning the reference to the refusal of those responsible for traffic management and then refused to fully despite repeated contact with them, appearing in the program and their point of view in response to the many criticisms of public opinion against the regime of Saher, which would aggravate the entrenched negative perceptions of the goals of Saher of citizens, who voted 71% of them followers of the program against the application of Sahir rejected in its current form.

Video Episode